zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tamas Penzes (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-102) Need to replace Jute with supported code
Date Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:23:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16827101#comment-16827101
] 

Tamas Penzes commented on ZOOKEEPER-102:
----------------------------------------

Based on the size of the task I think it would worth to discuss which option to choose.

[~maoling] would you start a DISCUSS thread on the mailing list to collect the pros and cons
of the options?

> Need to replace Jute with supported code
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-102
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Benjamin Reed
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.0.0
>
>
> ZooKeeper currently uses Jute to serialize objects to put on the wire and on disk. We
pulled Jute out of Hadoop and added a C binding. Both versions of Jute have evolved (although
Hadoop still doesn't have a C binding). It would be nice to use a more standard serialization
library. Some options include Thrift or Google's protocol buffers.
> Our main requirements would be Java and C bindings and good performance. (For example,
serializing to XML would give us incredibly bad performance and would not be acceptible!)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message