zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andor Molnar (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-102) Need to replace Jute with supported code
Date Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:34:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16827053#comment-16827053
] 

Andor Molnar commented on ZOOKEEPER-102:
----------------------------------------

[~maoling] [~belugabehr] It's very nice to see you guys are already working on the next big
project: replacing Jute with something better.

Off the top of my head I would say Protobufs would be the best to move to. Why aren't you
considering that? Being not part of Apache is nor a problem, neither a valid reason.

> Need to replace Jute with supported code
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-102
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Benjamin Reed
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.0.0
>
>
> ZooKeeper currently uses Jute to serialize objects to put on the wire and on disk. We
pulled Jute out of Hadoop and added a C binding. Both versions of Jute have evolved (although
Hadoop still doesn't have a C binding). It would be nice to use a more standard serialization
library. Some options include Thrift or Google's protocol buffers.
> Our main requirements would be Java and C bindings and good performance. (For example,
serializing to XML would give us incredibly bad performance and would not be acceptible!)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message