zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2
Date Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:50:24 GMT
ic - thanks!

Patrick

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:38 AM Justin Ling Mao <maoling199210191@sina.com>
wrote:

> ---> "That's cool, thanks Justin. I'd be interested to know - did you use
> the legacy/old c client binaries from the github repo or did you rebuild
> them? What about zkpython itself? I could see benefits or either/both."
> @PatrickTo use that(your) benchmark tool, I did something like
> following:cd zookeeper-3.5.5/src/c./configuremake make install# bulid
> zkpython from source code:wget
> https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/14/38/a761465ab0a154405c11f7e5d6e81edf6e84584e114e152fddd340f7d6d3/zkpython-0.4.2.tar.gzpython
> setup.py installexport LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/then I cd the
> zk-smoketest dir,exec the following:./zk-latencies.py --servers
> "localhost:2181" --root_znode="/zk-latencies_666" --znode_count=10000
> --znode_size=100 --synchronous
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
> To: DevZooKeeper <dev@zookeeper.apache.org>, maoling199210191@sina.com
> Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2
> Date: 2019-04-08 12:24
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 11:47 PM Justin Ling Mao <maoling199210191@sina.com>
> wrote:
> Test for the 3.5.5 candidate 2:
> -[0]: Jepsen consistency check had passed. +1.       Look at the
> attachment: jepsen_test_report.txt.       how to use it:
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/883
> -[1] <https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/883-%5B1%5D>: zk smoke and
> latencies test passed, comparing to 3.5.4-beta, no any notable perfermance
> improvement .+1.      The tool:  https://github.com/phunt/zk-smoketest
>    Env:       8 cores + 16GB Memory + 256GB SSD(my local Mac Pro 2015)
>  java version:"1.8.0_191"       Look at the benchmark report:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QnADbG9bCGMyTorEi67jQXWQSUVXQ1yQADgLV4LJHcg/edit#gid=0
> That's cool, thanks Justin. I'd be interested to know - did you use the
> legacy/old c client binaries from the github repo or did you rebuild them?
> What about zkpython itself? I could see benefits or either/both.
> Regards,
> Patrick -[2]: zkCli test passed.(base operation:create,set,get,delete
> ...etc)    +1.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com>
> To: DevZooKeeper <dev@zookeeper.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2
> Date: 2019-04-06 17:49
>
> Tamas,
> Il sab 6 apr 2019, 10:47 Tamas Penzes <tamaas@cloudera.com.invalid> ha
> scritto:
> > Hi Enrico,
> >
> > Just my 2cents.
> >
> > Having the sources jars in the binary package can be useful if you want
> to
> > debug without downloading the source tarball or checking out the whole
> > project from github. In the same time it is not needed on the classpath.
> >
> > The docs html is generated from md files now, but the design didn't get
> > updated. I wanted to do it (to have the same design as the website), but
> > never had time for that. It doesn't look a blocker for me, can be done in
> > any release later.
> >
> I agree, not all my points are blockers.
> The most critical point is that the source tarball does not reflect the tag
> and, important files are missing.
> Cheers
> Enrico
> > Regards, Tamaas
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 17:37 Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > -1 (non binding)
> > >
> > > Good news:
> > > I have build the sources with jdk-8 and all tests passed
> > > checksums and signatures are ok
> > > I run a few smoke tests running on JDK11, all is ok
> > >
> > > Bad news:
> > > I see the following problems in the "binary package", not all blockers:
> > > - we have a lib/cobertura directory, not useful
> > > - we have zookeeper-3.5.5-sources.jar not needed in the "binary"
> > > package on the classpath
> > > - we also have all of the 'recipes' not needed in the "binary" package
> > > on the classpath
> > > - inside the "docs" directory I see a webside with a very old look and
> > feel
> > >
> > > The source package does not reflect the repository, for instance
> > > build.xml file, owaspSuppressions.xml,
> > > excludeFindBugsFilter.xml.....are missing.
> > > I think we have to release in a "source package" a clean copy of ASF
> > > repository at the released "git tag"
> > >
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > > Il giorno ven 5 apr 2019 alle ore 14:35 Andor Molnar
> > > <andor@apache.org> ha scritto:
> > > >
> > > > This is the first stable release of 3.5 branch: 3.5.5. It resolves
> 117
> > > issues, including Maven migration, Quorum TLS, TTL nodes and lots of
> > other
> > > performance and stability improvements.
> > > >
> > > > The full release notes is available at:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12343268
> > > >
> > > > *** Please download, test and vote by April 12th 2019, 23:59 UTC+0.
> ***
> > > >
> > > > Source files:
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.5.5-rc2/
> > > >
> > > > Maven staging repos:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/parent/3.5.5/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper-jute/3.5.5/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/3.5.5/
> > > >
> > > > The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.5.5-rc2
> > > >
> > > > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Should we release this candidate?
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message