zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Question on ZK commit/patch policy.
Date Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:54:55 GMT
Is it because of simplicity (no need to decide whether a jira is necessary) or there’s a
huge downside of committing patches without Jiras?

Andor



> On 2019. Feb 27., at 17:41, Jordan Zimmerman <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> 
> For Curator we require a Jira. If we get a PR without a Jira we always ask them to create
one.
> 
> -JZ
> 
>> On Feb 27, 2019, at 11:37 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Historically we've only committed changes that have an associated JIRA. Now
>> with the move to gitbox we are seeing increased submissions (PRs) that
>> don't include a JIRA - I just committed one and then realized that it
>> didn't include a JIRA (sorry about that!). Given github and the recent move
>> to gitbox significantly streamlines the contribution process I'm wondering
>> if we should reconsider our process. Any thoughts? Anyone work on another
>> Apache project that does things differently and has pro/con to share?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Patrick
> 


Mime
View raw message