zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norbert Kalmar <nkal...@cloudera.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: [SUGGESTION] Jute's place in the new directory structure
Date Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:03:00 GMT
Hi Michael,

Yes, there is a plan to have one more step, which will introduce
zookeeper-server and zookeeper-common top level directory, and
zookeeper-client-java under zookeeper-client.
See ZOOKEEPER-3032 for an outlined final structure.

Regards,
Norbert

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:15 PM Michael Han <hanm@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for zookeeper-jute.
>
> A side question since we are at this - are there going to be more top level
> folders that maps to current source structure- such as zookeeper-common,
> zookeeper-cli, etc?
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Il mar 28 ago 2018, 23:37 Brian Nixon <brian.nixon.cs@gmail.com> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > I still think it makes sense to keep it as a top level directory (would
> > not
> > > include it in recipes). 'zookeeper-jute' is certainly a reasonable
> name.
> > :)
> > >
> >
> > +1 for zookeeper-jute
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> >
> > > -Brian
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:59 AM Norbert Kalmar
> > > <nkalmar@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > So jute is a little bit the odd one out in ZooKeeper. It was pulled
> out
> > > of
> > > > Hadoop and it evolved independently since with ZooKeeper. And it has
> > its
> > > > own namespace in ZK: org.apache.jute beside org.apache.zookeeper.
> > > >
> > > > For me, this is a bit odd, it suggests its a top level apache
> project.
> > > > The original plan in the maven migration was to move jute to simply
> in
> > a
> > > > "jute" top level directory in zookeeper. Like this:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > zookeeper | -bin | -conf | -jute | -zookeeper-client |
> > > -zookeeper-contrib |
> > > > -zookeeper-docs | -zookeeper-it (integration tests) |
> > -zookeeper-server |
> > > > -zookeeper-recipes
> > > >
> > > > But this just seems a bit strange to me. I was thinking of possibly
> > > moving
> > > > into recipes, but then again, I ended up thinking it could still get
> > its
> > > > own top level directory, but with the name "zookeeper-jute", as this
> > > > particular project is only used by ZooKeeper (of course I would keep
> > the
> > > > package name intact).
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > > As this is a change that was not in the initial doc about maven
> > > migration,
> > > > I thought it's best to ask.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Norbert
> > > >
> > > > p.s.: The best thing would be to use a more standardized library for
> > > > serialization like protobuf or Avro. But that's just a distant dream
> > > right
> > > > now, maybe ZooKeeper v5.0 ;)
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message