zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Han <h...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [SUGGESTION] Jute's place in the new directory structure
Date Wed, 29 Aug 2018 04:15:39 GMT
+1 for zookeeper-jute.

A side question since we are at this - are there going to be more top level
folders that maps to current source structure- such as zookeeper-common,
zookeeper-cli, etc?

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Il mar 28 ago 2018, 23:37 Brian Nixon <brian.nixon.cs@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
> > I still think it makes sense to keep it as a top level directory (would
> not
> > include it in recipes). 'zookeeper-jute' is certainly a reasonable name.
> :)
> >
>
> +1 for zookeeper-jute
>
> Enrico
>
>
> > -Brian
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:59 AM Norbert Kalmar
> > <nkalmar@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > So jute is a little bit the odd one out in ZooKeeper. It was pulled out
> > of
> > > Hadoop and it evolved independently since with ZooKeeper. And it has
> its
> > > own namespace in ZK: org.apache.jute beside org.apache.zookeeper.
> > >
> > > For me, this is a bit odd, it suggests its a top level apache project.
> > > The original plan in the maven migration was to move jute to simply in
> a
> > > "jute" top level directory in zookeeper. Like this:
> > >
> > >
> > > zookeeper | -bin | -conf | -jute | -zookeeper-client |
> > -zookeeper-contrib |
> > > -zookeeper-docs | -zookeeper-it (integration tests) |
> -zookeeper-server |
> > > -zookeeper-recipes
> > >
> > > But this just seems a bit strange to me. I was thinking of possibly
> > moving
> > > into recipes, but then again, I ended up thinking it could still get
> its
> > > own top level directory, but with the name "zookeeper-jute", as this
> > > particular project is only used by ZooKeeper (of course I would keep
> the
> > > package name intact).
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > > As this is a change that was not in the initial doc about maven
> > migration,
> > > I thought it's best to ask.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Norbert
> > >
> > > p.s.: The best thing would be to use a more standardized library for
> > > serialization like protobuf or Avro. But that's just a distant dream
> > right
> > > now, maybe ZooKeeper v5.0 ;)
> > >
> >
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message