zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release
Date Tue, 08 May 2018 03:56:42 GMT
There's been plenty of time for someone to get these into 3.5.4 before now.
I really want to get 3.5.4 out so that folks can access/assess what's
currently committed.

I'm happy to drive a follow-on release with these changes soon after 3.5.4
ships if there's sufficient progress.

Patrick

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Alexander Shraer <shralex@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lets also get this in: https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2959
> This affects anyone running observers.
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > We should strongly consider merging this:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982
> >
> > As it is causing problems to anyone using ZK on K8s.
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> > > On 7 May 2018, at 17:32, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rakeshr@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I have added my feedback to the PR. Please take a look at it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Rakesh
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> No one has looked at 2901, while I'm not super happy with it it seems
> > fine
> > >> - I'll commit it as-is if I don't hear anything by EOD tomorrow
> > (Monday).
> > >> After which I'll start the release process.
> > >>
> > >> Patrick
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Andor Molnar <andor@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I'm currently working on ZOOKEEPER-2184. PR has been open for ages
on
> > 3.4
> > >>> branch, please review if you have some capacity.
> > >>> I'll port the fix to the 3.5 branch too, if we have an agreement and
> > >>> 3.4-version is merged.
> > >>>
> > >>> ZK-2982 is somewhat related, I believe my changes will fix that one
> > too.
> > >>>
> > >>> ZK-1818 is probably tough, but patch is already available. Somebody
> > >> should
> > >>> pick it up, which I'm happy to do once finished with above stuff.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Andor
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Michael Han <hanm@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 on 3.5.4 release planning.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>> There are 10 open blocker issues marked for 3.5.4. Can
I get some
> > >> help
> > >>>> to sort out those issues?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The url posted does not work for me, here is the query I use:
> > >>>> https://goo.gl/3MJZMN
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Just had a chance to go through the JIRA and did some clean ups.
> > >>>> - 1159: lower the priority from blocker to major.
> > >>>> - 761: resolved because the code is merged.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ZOOKEEPER-2903, 2184, 2982 looks like real blockers for the 3.5.4
> > >>> release.
> > >>>> The rest of the blockers are legacy that's get postponed
> indefinitely.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Ok, I can have a look at ZK-2901. I'd like to get ZK-2982 in
as
> well
> > >> as
> > >>>> it
> > >>>>> is causing us problems with Kubernetes. The fix is simple,
but I'm
> > >>>>> wondering about adding a test case.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Flavio
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 14 Mar 2018, at 17:30, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I would like to cut 3.5.4. Need more eyes on 2901 though.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Patrick
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And
with that,
> will
> > >>> we
> > >>>>> cut
> > >>>>>>> a 3.5.4 release?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -Flavio
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 7 Dec 2017, at 00:27, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I haven't forgotten about this - we've been stuck
on
> > >> ZOOKEEPER-2901
> > >>>> . I
> > >>>>>>>> think we getting closer but it's been tricky to
navigate
> > >> addressing
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>>> issue vs backward compat vs making things worse.
I was about to
> > >>> sign
> > >>>>> off
> > >>>>>>>> then noticed I had missed something. Jordan has
been working to
> > >>>>> address.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Camille, Edward -- it would be good if you could
take a look at
> > >>> 2901
> > >>>>>>> given
> > >>>>>>>> you participated in the original creation/commit
of this
> feature.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Patrick
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Karan Mehta <
> > >>>> karanmehta93@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Can we get ZOOKEEPER-2770
> > >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770>
in as
> > >>> well?
> > >>>>> The
> > >>>>>>> PR
> > >>>>>>>>> is ready for review at https://github.com/apache/
> > >>> zookeeper/pull/307
> > >>>>>>>>> It will be a nice feature addition. Thanks!
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Regards
> > >>>>>>>>> Karan
> > >>>>>>>>> ᐧ
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman
<
> > >>>>>>>>> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Afaict the only real blocker for the
release at this point is
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-2901 - Jordan can you resolve
the comments, after
> > >>> which
> > >>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>> be good to go. LMK if there's anything
I'm missing.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I'll have this done in the next day or
so. Please wait for me
> > >> if
> > >>>> you
> > >>>>>>> can!
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> -Jordan
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message