zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2845) Data inconsistency issue due to retain database in leader election
Date Tue, 13 Feb 2018 19:47:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16362939#comment-16362939
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2845:
-------------------------------------------

Github user revans2 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/453
  
    @anmolnar I added in an updated version of the test in #310. The issue turned out to be
a race condition where the original leader would time out clients and then would join the
new quorum too quickly for the test to be able to detect it.  I changed it so there is a hard
coded sleep instead and then just shut down the leader.  I would love to get rid of the hard
coded sleep, but I wasn't really sure how to do it without making some major changes in the
leader code to put in a synchronization point.  If you really want me to do it I can, but
it felt rather intrusive.
    
    I verified that when I comment out my code that does the fast forward the test fails and
when I put it back the test passes.  If this looks OK I'll try to port the test to the other
release branches too.
    
    I also addressed your request to make some of the code common.


> Data inconsistency issue due to retain database in leader election
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2845
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: quorum
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.10, 3.5.3, 3.6.0
>            Reporter: Fangmin Lv
>            Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Priority: Critical
>
> In ZOOKEEPER-2678, the ZKDatabase is retained to reduce the unavailable time during leader
election. In ZooKeeper ensemble, it's possible that the snapshot is ahead of txn file (due
to slow disk on the server, etc), or the txn file is ahead of snapshot due to no commit message
being received yet. 
> If snapshot is ahead of txn file, since the SyncRequestProcessor queue will be drained
during shutdown, the snapshot and txn file will keep consistent before leader election happening,
so this is not an issue.
> But if txn is ahead of snapshot, it's possible that the ensemble will have data inconsistent
issue, here is the simplified scenario to show the issue:
> Let's say we have a 3 servers in the ensemble, server A and B are followers, and C is
leader, and all the snapshot and txn are up to T0:
> 1. A new request reached to leader C to create Node N, and it's converted to txn T1 
> 2. Txn T1 was synced to disk in C, but just before the proposal reaching out to the followers,
A and B restarted, so the T1 didn't exist in A and B
> 3. A and B formed a new quorum after restart, let's say B is the leader
> 4. C changed to looking state due to no enough followers, it will sync with leader B
with last Zxid T0, which will have an empty diff sync
> 5. Before C take snapshot it restarted, it replayed the txns on disk which includes T1,
now it will have Node N, but A and B doesn't have it.
> Also I included the a test case to reproduce this issue consistently. 
> We have a totally different RetainDB version which will avoid this issue by doing consensus
between snapshot and txn files before leader election, will submit for review.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message