zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2915) Use "strict" conflict management in ivy
Date Mon, 04 Dec 2017 19:30:01 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16277327#comment-16277327

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2915:

Github user afine closed the pull request at:


> Use "strict" conflict management in ivy
> ---------------------------------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2915
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2915
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.11, 3.5.4, 3.6.0
>            Reporter: Abraham Fine
>            Assignee: Abraham Fine
>             Fix For: 3.4.11, 3.5.4, 3.6.0
> Currently it is very difficult to tell exactly which dependencies make it into the final
classpath of zookeeper. We do not perform any conflict resolution between the test and default
classpaths (this has resulted in strange behavior with the slf4j-log4j12 binding) and have
no way of telling if a change to the dependencies has altered the transitive dependencies
pulled down by the project. 
> Our dependency list is relatively small so we should use "strict" conflict management
(break the build when we try to pull two versions of the same dependency) so we can exercise
maximum control over the classpath. 
> Note: I also attempted to find a way to see if I could always prefer transitive dependencies
from the default configuration over those pulled by the test configuration (to make sure that
the zookeeper we test against has the same dependencies as the one we ship) but this appears
to be impossible (or at least incredibly difficult) with ivy. Any opinions here would be greatly

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message