zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Benediktson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2471) Java Zookeeper Client incorrectly considers time spent sleeping as time spent connecting, potentially resulting in infinite reconnect loop
Date Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:40:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16155862#comment-16155862

Dan Benediktson commented on ZOOKEEPER-2471:

Hey, sorry, I've been meaning to get back to this, but I wasn't expecting to sign up for porting
the exponential backoff retry until this was in. Polishing that patch up so that it can be
accepted in mainline will take me a fair bit more time, since our version of the code straight-up
replaced the existing logic with jittered exponential backoff (we haven't run a JVM ZK client
without jittered exponential backoff in > 1.5 years), and I doubt Apache ZK would be willing
to accept that. I simply don't have time right now to do that work, and won't for at least
a month. It also makes me a bit nervous to offer a pull request for the exponential backoff
feature without this fix already checked in, since this was an extremely expensive bug for
us, but I'm sympathetic to the desire to unit test it; we simply didn't have time to concoct
a unit test back when we needed the fix urgently, since the nature of Zookeeper code makes
it generally pretty difficult to add unit tests for most areas, including this one.

> Java Zookeeper Client incorrectly considers time spent sleeping as time spent connecting,
potentially resulting in infinite reconnect loop
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2471
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2471
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java client
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.3
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Dan Benediktson
>            Assignee: Dan Benediktson
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2471.patch
> ClientCnxnSocket uses a member variable "now" to track the current time, and lastSend
/ lastHeard variables to track socket liveness. Implementations, and even ClientCnxn itself,
are expected to call both updateNow() to reset "now" to System.currentTimeMillis, and then
call updateLastSend()/updateLastHeard() on IO completions.
> This is a fragile contract, so it's not surprising that there's a bug resulting from
it: ClientCnxn.SendThread.run() calls updateLastSendAndHeard() as soon as startConnect() returns,
but it does not call updateNow() first. I expect when this was written, either the expectation
was that startConnect() was an asynchronous operation and that updateNow() would have been
called very recently, or simply the requirement to call updateNow() was forgotten at this
point. As far as I can see, this bug has been present since the "updateNow" method was first
introduced in the distant past. As it turns out, since startConnect() calls HostProvider.next(),
which can sleep, quite a lot of time can pass, leaving a big gap between "now" and now.
> If you are using very short session timeouts (one of our ZK ensembles has many clients
using a 1-second timeout), this is potentially disastrous, because the sleep time may exceed
the connection timeout itself, which can potentially result in the Java client being stuck
in a perpetual reconnect loop. The exact code path it goes through in this case is complicated,
because there has to be a previously-closed socket still waiting in the selector (otherwise,
the first timeout evaluation will not fail because "now" still hasn't been updated, and then
the actual connect timeout will be applied in ClientCnxnSocket.doTransport()) so that select()
will harvest the IO from the previous socket and updateNow(), resulting in the next loop through
ClientCnxnSocket.SendThread.run() observing the spurious timeout and failing. In practice
it does happen to us fairly frequently; we only got to the bottom of the bug yesterday. Worse,
when it does happen, the Zookeeper client object is rendered unusable: it's stuck in a perpetual
reconnect loop where it keeps sleeping, opening a socket, and immediately closing it.
> I have a patch. Rather than calling updateNow() right after startConnect(), my fix is
to remove the "now" member variable and the updateNow() method entirely, and to instead just
call System.currentTimeMillis() whenever time needs to be evaluated. I realize there is a
benefit (aside from a trivial micro-optimization not worth worrying about) to having the time
be "fixed", particularly for truth in the logging: if time is fixed by an updateNow() call,
then the log for a timeout will still show exactly the same value the code reasoned about.
However, this benefit is in my opinion not enough to merit the fragility of the contract which
led to this (for us) highly impactful and difficult-to-find bug in the first place.
> I'm currently running ant tests locally against my patch on trunk, and then I'll upload
it here.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message