Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 089891661EA for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:08:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 34538 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2017 04:08:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 34332 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2017 04:08:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:08:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 46D181A1D54 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:08:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H6PC4950FAZ7 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 29958610D9 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6BA82E0E4A for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id A2AAF2538F for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:08:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Michael Han (JIRA)" To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2845) Data inconsistency issue due to retain database in leader election MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16136242#comment-16136242 ] Michael Han commented on ZOOKEEPER-2845: ---------------------------------------- Thanks for the update, [~lvfangmin]. Good to know the patch is tested in prod environment! > Data inconsistency issue due to retain database in leader election > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ZOOKEEPER-2845 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2845 > Project: ZooKeeper > Issue Type: Bug > Components: quorum > Affects Versions: 3.4.10, 3.5.3, 3.6.0 > Reporter: Fangmin Lv > Assignee: Fangmin Lv > Priority: Critical > > In ZOOKEEPER-2678, the ZKDatabase is retained to reduce the unavailable time during leader election. In ZooKeeper ensemble, it's possible that the snapshot is ahead of txn file (due to slow disk on the server, etc), or the txn file is ahead of snapshot due to no commit message being received yet. > If snapshot is ahead of txn file, since the SyncRequestProcessor queue will be drained during shutdown, the snapshot and txn file will keep consistent before leader election happening, so this is not an issue. > But if txn is ahead of snapshot, it's possible that the ensemble will have data inconsistent issue, here is the simplified scenario to show the issue: > Let's say we have a 3 servers in the ensemble, server A and B are followers, and C is leader, and all the snapshot and txn are up to T0: > 1. A new request reached to leader C to create Node N, and it's converted to txn T1 > 2. Txn T1 was synced to disk in C, but just before the proposal reaching out to the followers, A and B restarted, so the T1 didn't exist in A and B > 3. A and B formed a new quorum after restart, let's say B is the leader > 4. C changed to looking state due to no enough followers, it will sync with leader B with last Zxid T0, which will have an empty diff sync > 5. Before C take snapshot it restarted, it replayed the txns on disk which includes T1, now it will have Node N, but A and B doesn't have it. > Also I included the a test case to reproduce this issue consistently. > We have a totally different RetainDB version which will avoid this issue by doing consensus between snapshot and txn files before leader election, will submit for review. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)