Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE637200C35 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:52:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BCFC9160B77; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1276B160B63 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:52:18 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 72758 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2017 15:52:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 72747 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2017 15:52:17 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7BD43C0115 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id irPxFPKlc8Rc for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com (mail-wr0-f196.google.com [209.85.128.196]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7E5C65FE3A for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id g10so17248616wrg.0 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:52:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5Hleq4lWi6IMjiLqO4ihMStZACT73vEq+gr+oG5YqqU=; b=bpExGzH0bEdhmbpT8yKf+FKMgOlGyxW7jN0tS/y4z5bSEc9YLh7iJ2xIL96P3X3sNH Gn1ZyDejfMLaNu75Alc0MSZh9X562X/cigc3iFegyY+SuM1RIQdrM107K9zHpYAzoz2S Pta0n2kf9RqnrQQeZ+NbdrzYkDbZqMSrYmtjKIEJky5MsR4hc3yYZQdt3WWmBQFoitjh LJXKU1AcqH7q7fxpKRgLxyAZJ0CuF2I/Ma5cWvCtJhkk7CIs01+vnuPs7g2ZvwVCEzbu ms6ZIQgOQfp4tY3siVIlPk/qi93P730UtQYe39p8N7wdoS9rIBKLHqCWTBK3xak9V6lr +kAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nlP8LQ1cwaz4X3vq15pleeufD/wAFVVkZP5F+2ULTFq9ZJTGGK/WbSt5d/8EaGTQ== X-Received: by 10.223.138.139 with SMTP id y11mr22649283wry.190.1489333589296; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fpj-mac.home (host86-159-189-31.range86-159.btcentralplus.com. [86.159.189.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b58sm21580998wra.47.2017.03.12.08.46.27 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: v 3.6.0 From: Flavio Junqueira In-Reply-To: <8F09F243-0F8D-48DA-9748-C04DFF4C6DA0@jordanzimmerman.com> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:46:25 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8F09F243-0F8D-48DA-9748-C04DFF4C6DA0@jordanzimmerman.com> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) archived-at: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:52:19 -0000 I had volunteered to manage it, but I got no cycles at all in the past = 2-3 months. We are also a bit late with the other 3.4 and 3.5 releases, = which helped with getting it delayed. I agree otherwise that it would be = great to have it sooner rather than later, though. -Flavio > On 11 Mar 2017, at 23:02, Jordan Zimmerman = wrote: >=20 > Is there any idea of date for 3.6.0? We really need TTL nodes and have = resorted to a fork internally to get it. I know that 3.5.x is the = current focus but at this rate how long, realistically, would we have = 3.6.0?=20 >=20 > -Jordan