zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Subject Re: v 3.6.0
Date Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:35:21 GMT
I'll work on a 3.5 port regardless. If folks have issues they can comment on the ticket.

-JZ

> On Mar 12, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Michael Han <hanm@cloudera.com> wrote:
> 
> If the goal is to get this TTL feature in an upcoming release then I'd say
> back port it to 3.5 is more realistic. We are in middle of release but I
> think the patch should be able to make in, if the back port can be done
> next week.
> 
> My only concern is that this feature is missing C client work. So we will
> release a new feature that only has Java client. I assume this is not a big
> deal, but I thought I should hear what others think about this.
> 
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> 
>> If 3.6 isn't coming anytime soon maybe I can port TTLs to 3.5. Any
>> objections to that?
>> 
>> -Jordan
>> 
>>> On Mar 12, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I had volunteered to manage it, but I got no cycles at all in the past
>> 2-3 months. We are also a bit late with the other 3.4 and 3.5 releases,
>> which helped with getting it delayed. I agree otherwise that it would be
>> great to have it sooner rather than later, though.
>>> 
>>> -Flavio
>>> 
>>>> On 11 Mar 2017, at 23:02, Jordan Zimmerman <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Is there any idea of date for 3.6.0? We really need TTL nodes and have
>> resorted to a fork internally to get it. I know that 3.5.x is the current
>> focus but at this rate how long, realistically, would we have 3.6.0?
>>>> 
>>>> -Jordan
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers
> Michael.


Mime
View raw message