zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From joshelser <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] zookeeper pull request #186: ZOOKEEPER-2711 Avoid synchronization on NettySe...
Date Tue, 07 Mar 2017 22:08:19 GMT
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:

    --- Diff: src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/NettyServerCnxnFactory.java ---
    @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ public void messageReceived(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, MessageEvent
                                 + " from " + ctx.getChannel());
                     NettyServerCnxn cnxn = (NettyServerCnxn)ctx.getAttachment();
    -                synchronized(cnxn) {
    +                synchronized(cnxn.getRpcLock()) {
                         processMessage(e, cnxn);
    --- End diff --
    > Now one thread can be in processMessage while another thread is getting stats about
the connection. Is that ok?
    I believe this is OK. We can receive two concurrent `stat` commands, but we only process
one of them at a time. I'm also not a Netty wizard, so I could be wildly wrong :)
    > Basically I am wondering if there is any other code out there that should now sync
on what getRpcLock() returns.
    That's a good point. I had looked to see that there were multiple other methods in `ServerCnxn`
which were also synchronized (thus, changing `dumpConnectionInfo(..)` wouldn't have been sufficient).
I didn't look to see if there's another code-path which is also synchronizing on the `NettyServerCnxn`
(or `ServerCnxn`).

If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.

View raw message