Mailing-List: contact dev-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALF7aMS0sHwz7htLqtvJneEv_epk3Oe7MfZ3VKGYjDMVMdxsGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANLc_9+8rXA8nnN47jBZ5pRVaK-Q7BiY0uCr=sgHi-LqZeucOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANLc_9LoFSsmxGbqAPdeNCnorRrB4+aH-Lbw301+N_HzUbgO6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKF1A=t1aHd6oBUnSoSPLVCeqTptXjaBr5zQHAC-ESwcZDK4ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALF7aMS0sHwz7htLqtvJneEv_epk3Oe7MfZ3VKGYjDMVMdxsGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:34:57 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAKR25ESEoAniVmJ3d8O6Vd7REG37G--jnbpcNGXka=G=qpivmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.6 (candidate 0)
From: Benjamin Reed <breed@apache.org>
To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+1 looks good pat. thanks for taking charge!

ben

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1, ran a 3 node cluster and tested manually with creation/deletion of
> nodes and making sure  the server bounce keeps state.
>
> Looks good to go.
>
> mahadev
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Camille Fournier <camille@apache.org> wrote:
>> +1. Started up a 3-node cluster, ran some basic tests against it, looks ok.
>>
>> C
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1. I ran the release candidate through it's paces with various
>>> ensemble sizes and it worked fine. I also ran RAT and the test suite
>>> and everything looks fine to me.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.6. 16 JIRAs are
>>> > addressed in this release.
>>> >
>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> > *** vote closes 11pm PT on Tuesday, July 31.***
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.6-candidate-0/
>>> >
>>> > Should we release this?
>>> >
>>> > Patrick
>>>