zipkin-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GitBox <...@apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] [incubator-zipkin-website] adriancole commented on issue #12: Revise content around downloads
Date Wed, 05 Jun 2019 00:49:16 GMT
adriancole commented on issue #12: Revise content around downloads
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-zipkin-website/issues/12#issuecomment-498895928
 
 
   for those curious, netbeans has only one download on their page, so not particularly relevant
to this topic apart from workload comparisons..
   
   OpenWhisk otoh is very relevant..  they have a categorized website to help steer people
through it. https://openwhisk.apache.org/downloads.html
   
   The below is about the legal feasibility about borrowing the code if it helps (both sites
are jekyll)..
   
   The website is mostly [IBM staff](https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-website/graphs/contributors),
and includes an [IBM-specific copyright note in their license](https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-website/blob/master/LICENSE.txt).
The ASF downloads page is also written by IBM, but it was contributed [after incubation](https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-website/pull/282).
This makes sense as this is an ASF requirement and not relevant pre-ASF.
   
   If we borrowed code contributed after ASF, written by a vendor in a project with the same
vendor in copyright notices.. would we require adding "Copyright 2015-2017 IBM Corporation"
to our LICENSE file? ITOW is the LICENSE addendum forever, or only up to the dates mentioned
about the vendor.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Mime
View raw message