xmlgraphics-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Date Mon, 27 Mar 2017 21:17:02 GMT
Since I am the only voter who is asking for fixes, I think it best to sync
them. Also, please update FOP to use the same xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar as
is used by Batik.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1984@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to redo the
> other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.
>
> Thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1984@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> Hi,
>
> Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
>
> Thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
> Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies
> between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
> artifacts:
>
>    - FOP 2.2 has
>       - serializer-2.7.0.jar
>    - BATIK 1.9 has
>       - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
>
> Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would
> expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
> > simonsteiner1984@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which
> >> was eg 1.8.
> >>
> >
> > understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep
> > an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
> > discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
> > example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work
> > beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we
> > use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
> >
> >    - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
> >    - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> >    - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> >
> > what do others think?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
> >> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
> >> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
> >>
> >> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
> >>
> >>    - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
> >>    - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
> >>    instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
> >> batik).
> >>    The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
> >> have been
> >>    2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
> >> qualifier
> >>    is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted
> the
> >>    final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
> >> causing
> >>    problems.
> >>
> >> G.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
> >> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> >
> >> > Hash: SHA1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source
> >> > zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Artifacts can be found there:
> >> >
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The release is signed with the key:
> >> >
> >> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > +1 from me.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> >
> >> > Version: GnuPG v1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
> >> >
> >> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
> >> >
> >> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
> >> >
> >> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
> >> >
> >> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
> >> >
> >> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
> >> >
> >> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
> >> >
> >> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
> >> >
> >> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
> >> >
> >> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
> >> >
> >> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
> >> >
> >> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
> >> >
> >> > =dYHK
> >> >
> >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message