xmlgraphics-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Bowditch <bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics FOP 2.0 (2nd attempt)
Date Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:18:05 GMT
Correct, that's why its common practice to provide both zip and tar 
files, with the tar files better suited for distribution to Linux systems

Chris

On 30/05/2015 19:56, Luis Bernardo wrote:
>
> Yes, it seems that this may be a limitation of the basic usage of the 
> zip format.
>
> On 5/30/15 6:31 PM, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
>>>> On 30 May 2015, at 12:36, Luis Bernardo <lmpmbernardo@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I found a minor problem that I would like others to double check.
>>>>
>>>> In the zip files, both the bin and the src, the fop script is not 
>>>> executable (tested on Linux and Mac OS X). The problem does not 
>>>> happen with the tar.gz files.
>>> Indeed. I had never noticed it before, but same thing here.
>>>
>>> That said, I quickly checked the zips for 1.1, and they were that 
>>> way as well.
>> BTW - Forgot to mention that it is already that way *in* the zip 
>> archive, when you check the contents with zipinfo. All files 
>> (non-directory) in the archive show as "-rw-r--r--"
>>
>>
>>
>> KR
>>
>> Andreas
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message