xmlgraphics-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Hancock <peter.hanc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Status of the new color infrastructure
Date Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:39:36 GMT
> Not sure I understand what you wanted to say.
I was trying to say that I felt that moving color utility code up to
XGC was generally desirable and having to reverting back was a shame.
By 'water down' I really meant reduce, which actually means the
opposite!  Sorry :-) .

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch> wrote:
>
> On 01.07.2010 13:03:43 Peter Hancock wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > > But I've just thought of a better alternative:
> > > Moving (!) ColorExt back to FOP where it was and moving
> > > GrayScaleConverter to FOP solves the whole problem with minimal effort
> > > in FOP Trunk.
> > Do you intend to refactor the static ColorUtil.toCMYKGrayColor method
> > to a member of GrayScaleConverter?
>
> I planned to move the toCMYKGrayColor method back to FOP's ColorUtil
> until things are resolved.
>
> > I think this move makes sense for this release but it is a shame to
> > water down the color package in XGC.
>
> Not sure I understand what you wanted to say.
>
> > Pete
> <snip/>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message