xmlgraphics-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From thomas.dewe...@kodak.com
Subject Re: FOP's new image package in Commons?
Date Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:53:23 GMT
Hi Cameron, Jeremias,

> Jeremias Maerki:
> > Another important point to consider here:
> > The image package currently makes extensive use of Apache Commons
> > Logging like the rest of FOP. [...]
> > Would it be so bad if Commons (and, as a consequence, Batik) added 
> > new dependency? Is there some room for discussion and reevaluation?

Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote on 12/12/2007 07:34:12 PM:

> I don?t mind so much.  I can?t talk for the other committers, though.

     Apache Commons Logging looks like a good solution to the problem.  It 
that it is a fairly independent module (i.e. using it doesn't imply 
pulling in a large framework
like Avalon). 

     Am I correct that a minimal install on JDK 1.4+ would be just the 

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message