Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47903 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2007 08:51:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Oct 2007 08:51:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 75114 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2007 08:51:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 75103 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2007 08:51:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:51:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.239.215.103] (HELO tux17.hoststar.ch) (213.239.215.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:51:35 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (adsl-84-227-175-150.adslplus.ch [84.227.175.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by tux17.hoststar.ch (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9L8m4dO023220 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:48:05 +0200 Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:48:53 +0200 From: Jeremias Maerki To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: Going for 1.4 or 1.5 as minimum Java version? In-Reply-To: <471906DF.5070208@databaar.ch> References: <20071017100950.6C6A.DEV@jeremias-maerki.ch> <471906DF.5070208@databaar.ch> Message-Id: <20071021104334.4CB8.DEV@jeremias-maerki.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.28.01 [en] X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000782-4, 20.10.2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That's the logical consequence, isn't it? Updating Checkstyle is totally independent of that, of course, but certainly no opposition from me here. Jeremias Maerki On 19.10.2007 21:34:55 J.Pietschmann wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > No reactions so far. >=20 > Oops! >=20 > > Interesting. Anyway, based on the user poll, my > > opinion is to go for Java 1.4 for the moment >=20 > Yessssss! Does this also mean dropping the src/java-1.3 > directory and assorted build.xml stuff? >=20 > [If we are at this, what about the checkstyle 3.5 support?] >=20 > J.Pietschmann --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org