xmlgraphics-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cameron McCormack <...@mcc.id.au>
Subject Third party license text
Date Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:33:16 GMT
Hi all.

The new release rules[1] say:

  If A Distribution Contains Code Under Several Licenses, Should It
  Contain Several License Files?

    No - all license information should be contained in the LICENSE

    When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the
    LICENSE file should contain details of all these licenses. For each
    component which is not Apache licensed, details of the component and
    the license under which the component is distributed should be
    appended to the LICENSE file. 

but does this also apply to bundled binaries (like Batik’s lib/js.jar),
or just included source files (like sources/org/w3c/dom/svg/SVGRect.java
— although I’m going to move across to using the xml-apis-ext.jar from
XML Commons for these files)?  So, should all of Batik’s lib/LICENSE.*
and lib/build/LICENSE.* contents be moved into the one LICENSE file?



[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html

Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
	xmpp:heycam@jabber.org  ▪  ICQ 26955922  ▪  MSN cam@mcc.id.au

Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

View raw message