xmlgraphics-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Bowditch <bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: Code reorganization
Date Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:17:10 GMT
Jeremias Maerki wrote:

> We still have the two general solutions in the Wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics/XmlGraphicsCommonComponents
> Proposal 2 is clearly superior to make the dependencies clearer and the
> make things easier for our users as well as the Batik team.
> Chris said he preferred that the transcoders should be writable by both
> teams which favors Proposal 1. It was also my first idea. But see above.

Yes, like you I wasnt keen for FOP to give up something it used to have 
control over. However, I rarely contribute any code to the project, so I'm not 
going to stand in the way of those that make regular contributions.

> A proposal 2a (a kind of compromise) would involve putting the basic
> Graphics2D implementations in the Commons area (no dependencies on Batik).
> The transcoders themselves would go into Batik. Of course, this also
> splits this part in two, possibly making it harder for the Batik team
> when doing bigger improvements. But I think it would address my (and
> Simon's) particular interest in the Graphics2D implementations. So my
> question would be what Chris and Thomas (and everyone else, of course)
> think about this variant.

This is a good compromise indeed.



Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

View raw message