xmlgraphics-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremias Maerki <dev.jerem...@greenmail.ch>
Subject Re: Opinion poll
Date Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:13:51 GMT

On 09.03.2005 14:14:16 Thomas DeWeese wrote:
> Hi Jeremias,
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Thomas, I apologize for the apparently bad wording. It was not my
> > intention to ignore your concerns. 
>     Ok.
> > There is no technical advantage. There are only technical disadvantages.
> > The proposal came out of the desire not to release all control over that
> > part. 
>     At some point we need to "sit down" and discuss exactly what code
> we are talking about as I think we have different ideas on this
> point (especially based on the XMLGraphics components thread).

Yes, we need to do that and then document it in the Wiki and then vote
on it.

>     I can't do that this week but sometime next week it might be
> good to do.

No problem.

> > Your counterproposal which I also put on the Wiki page is clearly
> > better even if it means we lose overall control over this part. I'm
> > pretty much the only one (besides Keiron, who's inactive, unfortunately)
> > maintained the transcoders. But I wanted to give everyone a chance to
> > say: No we can't do that. I totally screwed up and the meaning didn't
> > get through. I'm sorry.
>     There are clearly access issues that need to be addressed,
> either by building trust (i.e. when you submit patches they are
> applied in a timely manner) or by granting access and I am very
> aware of this.  I would hate to see this push against the correct
> technical decision.

I think with the split of the transcoder code into Batik-dependent and
non-Batik-dependent code my concerns about access would be dealt with.

Jeremias Maerki

Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

View raw message