Mailing-List: contact fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <32298969.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: champagne_chary <antoine@champers.co.uk>
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: fo:marker bleeding issue [fop 0.95 & FOP 1.0]
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP214598CB25E16B4580C6302FB2A0@phx.gbl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <29532209.post@talk.nabble.com> <32286942.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <BLU0-SMTP214598CB25E16B4580C6302FB2A0@phx.gbl>


One line is all it need.. If only I could get to grips with the method used/
see how xslt is formated to produce given xsl.fo


cbowditch wrote:
> 
> On 18/08/2011 13:25, champagne_chary wrote:
>> Hello,
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> Sorry to revive this year old post.
>>
>> I'm completly new to this and what you seem to have achieved -despite
>> this
>> minor glitch- is exactly what I would like to implement. However I'm a
>> complete newb..I can see the fo but would be interested in seeing how and
>> where you have placed the markers to achieve this.
>> If you can post/ or pm me I'd be very thankful as hours of googling and
>> failed attempts at pacing headers have lead to nothing but failure.
> 
> I don't think there is a way to simulate table markers properly in the 
> current FOP version. As the original poster indicates, he can getting 
> close to a working solution with regular markers but there are some 
> corner cases where it doesn't work. I am not aware of a way to get it 
> fully working, however, some of my colleagues have been looking into 
> implementing table Markers. This is on our TODO list, but I think the 
> planned implementation is still limited to 1 line of text in the header. 
> Vincent, please correct me if I'm wrong.
> 
>> Hope you receive this and can help.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris
> 
>>
>>
>> bonekrusher wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In order to have "table headers continued" in my pdf output, I am using
>>> markers. Everything works fine until there is more then one line on the
>>> 1st marker and there is a second marker. If the 1st marker is more than
>>> one line and I add a second marker, the marker bleeds into the table on
>>> the second page (see attached pdf). One solution to to increase the
>>> @margin-top on the region-body. The problem with that is  there are many
>>> times when the markers are not needed and there is a huge whitespace
>>> where
>>> the markers would go. For example, if the margin-top="1.0in", there
>>> would
>>> be a one inch whitespace if the markers are not called.
>>>
>>> See attached example fo and pdf. Page 2 of the pdf is where the problem
>>> occurs. I need the table to start below "Table 3. Table Title Marker -
>>> Continued".
>>>
>>> I am not sure how to resolve this.
>>>   http://old.nabble.com/file/p29532209/testMaint.fo testMaint.fo
>>>   http://old.nabble.com/file/p29532209/example.pdf example.pdf
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help
>>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/fo%3Amarker-bleeding-issue--fop-0.95---FOP-1.0--tp29532209p32298969.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org