Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-fop-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90302 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 15:10:20 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 15:10:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 67127 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 15:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-fop-user-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 67094 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2004 15:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fop-user-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: fop-user@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list fop-user@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 67081 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 15:10:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.medata.com) (65.104.121.53) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 15:10:11 -0000 Received: from [172.24.2.18] (proc012 [172.24.2.18] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.medata.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i28FAB1X022981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:10:11 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) In-Reply-To: <404C8B7D.7050503@hotmail.com> References: <404C4201.5020207@hotmail.com> <3E7257CB-7111-11D8-87F7-000393448246@medata.com> <404C8B7D.7050503@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Image-Url: http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/.cv/thumbs/me.thumbnail From: Clay Leeds Subject: Re: Image size Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:10:09 -0800 To: fop-user@xml.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.67, clamav-milter version 0.66n X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Chris, On Mar 8, 2004, at 7:04 AM, Chris Bowditch wrote: > Clay Leeds wrote: > >> The workaround for me (with regard to the 72dpi image problem) has >> been to create a JPG with a resolution of 300dpi (note: large file >> size), and then scale the image down if necessary. This produces high >> resolution logos for placement in our FOP-rendered pages without >> pixelation. > > Clay - in order to scale the image down you need to specify a height > and width, and Muthukumar was saying that he couldnt specify them > because he didnt know them. > > Ahh! I misunderstood the portion: > However, without width and height specified FOP outputs the image at > 72dpi. Too true. Perhaps Muthukumar could specify either the height or the width, or could specify the content-height or the content-width to overcome this. At least specifying one of those values might help maintain a sense of scale... Thanks for the clarification! Web Maestro Clay --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-user-help@xml.apache.org