Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-fop-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47364 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2006 12:09:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2006 12:09:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 56566 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2006 12:09:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-fop-dev-archive@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 56547 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2006 12:09:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fop-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 56536 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2006 12:09:26 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:09:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [213.239.215.103] (HELO tux17.hoststar.ch) (213.239.215.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:09:25 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (zux221-103-090.adsl.green.ch [81.221.103.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by tux17.hoststar.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3LC9884031338 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:09:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:08:13 +0200 From: Jeremias Maerki To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: PNCL patch In-Reply-To: <4448D0BF.8070103@skynet.be> References: <4448D0BF.8070103@skynet.be> Message-Id: <20060421135235.73C2.DEV@jeremias-maerki.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.12.01 [en] X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0616-3, 04/20/2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Pierre-Henri, I did see the patch and it's on the top of my list, but with the 0.92 release and a few other things I had too much going on in my head. I can look at your patch during the weekend. I'm sorry for the delay. So many years and noone wanted to do auto table layout, and now, we have two at the same time. :-) I don't like deciding who will get the job because this is a democratic environment. You guys should decide among yourselves. The sooner we get that feature, the better for FOP, obviously. I think there are a lot of things that can be attacked besides auto table layout. *shrug* On 21.04.2006 14:31:59 Pierre-Henri Kraus wrote: > Hello, > I don't know if you noticed but i posted a patch for the support of the > PNCL element last week, and i was hoping for some feedback to know if i > could develop another feature of FOP :) > I spoke with my teacher and he would be interested that i do the auto > table layout property (basic support), but i saw recently on the fop-dev > mailing list that another guy was interested in it, so i was wondering > if i could do it anyway ? > > Pierre-Henri Jeremias Maerki