Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-fop-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44737 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2005 12:00:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 2005 12:00:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 78393 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2005 12:00:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-fop-dev-archive@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 78377 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2005 12:00:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fop-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 78364 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2005 12:00:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 05:00:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [81.221.250.200] (HELO smtp.messaging.ch) (81.221.250.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 04:59:59 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([81.221.94.218]) by smtp.messaging.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:00:04 +0200 Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:59:50 +0200 From: Jeremias Maerki To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: rtflib independance from FOP (continued) + JAFOG In-Reply-To: References: <20050802115420.23C6.DEV.JEREMIAS@greenmail.ch> Message-Id: <20050802135837.23CC.DEV.JEREMIAS@greenmail.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.12.01 [en] X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0531-0, 08/01/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Aug 2005 12:00:04.0399 (UTC) FILETIME=[B7F35BF0:01C59759] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Uhm, oops, yeah, sorry! Of course. Thanks for spotting that mistake. On 02.08.2005 12:36:41 Chris Bowditch wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > > >>And also I am not really sure whether the most up-to-date version of > >>rtflib lies in FOP or in JFOR... Could someone please clarify this? > >>(Bertrand?) > > > > > > JFOR has been integrated in FOP, so FOP is not the most up-to-date > > version. > > Is this a typo, or did you mean to say FOP is *not* the most up-to-date > place for thr RTF Renderer? I thought the JFOR project had stopped and > since integrating the RTF Renderer into FOP, several improvements had > been made to the RTF Renderer in FOP. > > > > Chris Jeremias Maerki