On 02.08.2005 12:22:02 guillaume wrote:
> > Uhm, I don't think we have current CVS snapshots anymore since we moved
> > to Subversion some time ago. Seems to be a left-over that we need to get
>
> Well, I took it from http://svn.apache.org/snapshots/ so the name would be
> quite misleading. And it seems not to be left-over as cocoon-2.2 is also
> featured here, and is IIRC younger than the Cocoon CVS-to-SVN
> transition...
As I said, I need to find out what I can do to clear this up.
>
> > rid of. Please download the sources using Subversion. Subversion has the
> > advantage over CVS that it works over HTTP and therefore passes
> > most Firewalls and Proxies.
>
> I will try.
>
>
> > Want to send a patch? :-)
>
> Sure, as long as the issues summed up in my other message are OK!
I told you what was important. Now it's up to you and we'll review when
the actual patch comes in.
> Would a
> "[PATCH] rtflib independant from FOP" bug in Bugzilla (with attachement
> done with diff -u with xml-fop/ as base directory) would do?
That's simply "svn diff >mydiff.txt" now with Subversion in place.
> > We'd prefer if you would subscribe if you want to take part in the
> > discussions.
>
> I understand that, but for the reasons described in my other message I'd
> rather not for the moment...
>
>
> > Thanks for your feedback!
>
> You're welcome. After (ab)using FOP so much it's time to give back for me! :)
LOL. I hope there will be many more who follow your example.
Jeremias Maerki
|