Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-fop-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 51505 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2003 10:00:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list fop-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 51494 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2003 10:00:48 -0000 Message-ID: <3E228E6A.7010002@multiconn.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:01:14 +0200 From: Oleg Tkachenko Organization: Multiconn Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20021225 X-Accept-Language: en-us, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: FOP logo References: <20030110144511.GA7527@expresso.localdomain> <3E206B37.6090303@yahoo.de> <3E20B84B.7090301@powerup.com.au> <200301121703.24294.bbrand@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <200301121703.24294.bbrand@freenet.de> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on XENA/MCN(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at 13/01/2003 12:02:29, Serialize by Router on XENA/MCN(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at 13/01/2003 12:02:30, Serialize complete at 13/01/2003 12:02:30 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bernd Brandstetter wrote: > feeling inspired by your's and Oleg's suggestions and also a little bit > bored this Sunday afternoon, I thought I'll take the chance and improve my > Gimping skills. Here's the result :-) Not bad. Something like this I meant. But (sorry for being critical, it's art, not coding :): why it's sitting back to us. F and P are too simple. And I'm not sure about scalability - e.g. how it'll look 3cmX2cm? -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Technologies, Israel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org