xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Arnd Beißner" <arnd.beiss...@cappelino.de>
Subject PDF Output consideration 1.3 vs. 1.4
Date Sat, 11 Jan 2003 18:32:03 GMT
Since you are currently discussing PDF 1.3 vs. 1.4 issues, there's one 
thing not
all of you may be aware of:

There's a relatively new standard called PDF/X-3. This is basically PDF 
1.3
with a number of restrictions. Some can be handled by the user (all fonts
must be embedded), some others must be adhered to by the PDF generator.

The intention of PDF/X is to standardize on a PDF subset that can be
handled without the usual problems in the prepress business (missing or
mismatched fonts, color mismatches, trapping etc.). 

For more information see http://www.pdfx.info. There's also a freeware 
PDF/X
preflight tool called PDF/X-3 Inspector (download URL: 
http://www.pdfx.info/download.html).

The reason I'm mentioning this is that one of the restrictions of PDF/X-3 
is
that the PDF file may not be PDF 1.4 (I'm not sure if lower than 1.3 is 
ok).

To pave the way for future PDF/X support, you may consider still 
supporting
PDF 1.3 in the redesign code tree. At least perhaps make it configurable.

Hope this information is useful.
--
Cappelino Informationstechnologie GmbH
Arnd Beißner

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message