xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oleg Tkachenko <ol...@multiconn.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] doc validation fix
Date Sat, 11 Jan 2003 19:40:07 GMT
Victor Mote wrote:

> I hope I am not out of line to ask an even more fundamental question -- do
> we like our current name?
I like it. First of all "FOP" is well-known among the whole xml 
community for ages (what costs much) and secondly "fop" word has a 
meaning itself wrt eXtensible stylesheet language. The Webster says 
about "fop":

Entry Word: fop
Function: noun
Text: a man who is conspicuously fashionable or elegant in dress or 
appearance <felt contempt for the mincing overdressed fop>
Synonyms Beau Brummel, blood, buck, coxcomb, dandy, dude, exquisite, 
gallant, lounge lizard, macaroni, petit-maƮtre, popinjay
Related Word fashion plate, silk stocking; blade, cavalier, 
man-about-town, spark, sport, swell; ladies' man, lady-killer, masher
Idioms man of the world

  I never have a problem writing it, but when
> speaking it, I cannot make my mouth say "fop", but invariably say
> "eff-oh-pee" instead.
May I ask why? (Sorry, after spending the whole day in the beach I'm a 
liitle bit stupid :)

-- 
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message