xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bernd Brandstetter <bbr...@freenet.de>
Subject Re: [PATCH] doc validation fix
Date Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:00:44 GMT
On Monday 13 January 2003 11:05, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 12.01.2003 11:40:57 Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
> > After having tried to understand how fop works by just reading the
> > code for a couple of hours now, FOrtress inevitably comes to my mind
> > ;-) (in the sense of: Not easy to get in, at least for a newbie)
> >
> :-) Unfortunately, Fortress is already taken by the Apache Avalon
>
> project for one their new containers. I bet they wouldn't be happy to
> hear your association with the name.
>
> Let's be serious again: What do you think could be improved to make FOP
> easier to get in?

Design documentation :-)
When I clicked on the "Architecture" and "Design" links, I had expected a 
bit more than 20 to 30 lines of text. But I must admit that I have totally 
overlooked the "Understanding the design" section which is a bit more 
verbose.
Still, it would be nice to have something in the style of the "Alt design" 
description - which I think is really great - for the "standard" design 
too.

Regards,
Bernd



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message