xmlgraphics-fop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bernd Brandstetter <bbr...@freenet.de>
Subject Re: [PATCH] doc validation fix
Date Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:40:57 GMT
On Saturday 11 January 2003 20:13, Victor Mote wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > - Do we like our current logo? :-)
>
> I hope I am not out of line to ask an even more fundamental question --
> do we like our current name? I never have a problem writing it, but when
> speaking it, I cannot make my mouth say "fop", but invariably say
> "eff-oh-pee" instead. Our root "FO" is a FOrtunate or perhaps FOrtuitous
> one, as there are many English words that start with these letters, and
> probably many more that contain them. FOr(r)est might have been good
> (since we seem to work with trees a lot), but is taken. FOrward, FOcus,
> or even FOreword might each work, or efFOrtless (????). How about
> FOliage (with a leaf logo)? Or perhaps a Latin word to reflect our
> international crew -- FOcus (again), or FOrtis, or FOrum. I also like
> Oleg's idea of throwing it out to the user community.

After having tried to understand how fop works by just reading the code for 
a couple of hours now, FOrtress inevitably comes to my mind ;-)
(in the sense of: Not easy to get in, at least for a newbie)

Bye,
Bernd



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message