+1
it would make JFOR and FOP "richer"
"John Kattestaart (Freeler)" wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Wright [mailto:jwright@palgraphics.com]
> > Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2001 21:06
> > To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [vote] Merging JFor with FOP
> >
> >
> > I don't officially count as these things go, but merging jfor and
> > fop would
> > solve several issues I currently have.
> >
>
> Yes combinune fop and jfor would make life easier.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org
|