Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-batik-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-batik-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBA7692E4 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71858 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2012 06:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-batik-users-archive@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 71466 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2012 06:28:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 71424 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2012 06:28:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:28:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.46.98] (HELO indoqa.com) (88.198.46.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 06:28:15 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chello212186121008.11.vie.surfer.at [212.186.121.8]) by indoqa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE172C403F; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:27:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FB348E3.70904@indoqa.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:27:47 +0200 From: Werner Guttmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org CC: Joel Uckelman Subject: Re: SVG to PNG transcoding and phaysical image sizes References: <4FB21685.1060101@indoqa.com> <20120515170547.8D5F03613CD@charybdis.ellipsis.cx> In-Reply-To: <20120515170547.8D5F03613CD@charybdis.ellipsis.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No, I haven't yet (and will), but it looks like the problem seems to be with some SVG text elements and their rendering on various platforms. Thanks Werner On 15.05.2012 19:05, Joel Uckelman wrote: > Thus spake Werner Guttmann: >> Hi, >> >> in one of our projects, we are currently using the PNGTranscoder to >> produce a PNG from an SVG, and everything works just fine (in terms of >> expected output, content, ...). As part of some recent testing, we came >> to realize that the PNGs produced are of differing physical byte sizes >> on different machines. >> >> E.g. a PNG image of dimension 1620x1118 px one one box has a size of >> 10,836 bytes, whereas a second server produces 10,864 bytes worth of PNG >> from the very same SVG (using the very same binary and thus process). Is >> this something we should be expecting, and if so, why is this the case ? > > That's not many bytes difference. Have you compared the PNGs in a hex > editor? It could be that one of the metadata fields has some system- > specific information in it. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org