Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-batik-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64321 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2008 14:34:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2008 14:34:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 24484 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2008 14:34:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xmlgraphics-batik-users-archive@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 24469 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2008 14:34:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 24458 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2008 14:34:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:34:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of uckelman@ellipsis.cx designates 66.253.49.165 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.253.49.165] (HELO charybdis.ellipsis.cx) (66.253.49.165) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:33:21 +0000 Received: by charybdis.ellipsis.cx (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2FC37100BF; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:33:47 -0700 (MST) To: batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: Batik 1.7 text rendering issues In-reply-to: <2a1ddf8a0808050635r4f798630if3452949affd6b26@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080805124206.GC10043@arc.mcc.id.au> <2a1ddf8a0808050635r4f798630if3452949affd6b26@mail.gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Helder_Magalh=E3es?=" message dated "Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:35:31 +0100." From: Joel Uckelman Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:33:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20080805143347.2FC37100BF@charybdis.ellipsis.cx> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thus spake "Helder Magalhães": > > I don't have anything against this (as it's a fairly simple thing to > > enable through reflection) but do you know how to determine which of the > > 4 LCD dot patterns to use? > > I'm not sure if this is even possible to determine automatically. If > not, maybe one could be able to do this using a preference: possibly a > new tab in Squiggle preferences, for example, where a canvas for each > dot pattern was showed. Something like the "ClearType Tuner" applet > [1] which allows tweaking Windows text smoothing. :-) > > [1] http://www.microsoft.com/typography/ClearTypePowerToy.mspx The fact that there's a "Rendering" section in the font configuration dialog in GNOME makes me suspect that this is something you can't always (ever?) read from the hardware. There is a correct answer to the question of what the subpixel order is on an LCD screen---it's not as though some people will prefer RGB and some BGR or VBGR rendering on the same panel. -- J. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org