xmlgraphics-batik-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davis-5 <t...@robertjdavis.co.uk>
Subject Re: PART SOLVED - DOCTYPE now in - Re: DOCTYPE and COMMENTS ignored by batik parser/SAXSVGDocumentFactory
Date Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:15:11 GMT

thomas.deweese wrote:
> Rob Davis-5 <tech@robertjdavis.co.uk> wrote on 03/13/2008 05:38:41 AM:
>> To solved this I've binned using batik's own parser and am using the DOM
>> LSParser instead.
>    Well really it's just that you have bypassed Batik's wrapper around
> the parser so you can get some of the intermediate information.  Note
> that you still don't get the DOCTYPE reflected in the DOM or anything
> you are just 'saving' it from the parsing operation.

Yes you right, I realise that now!

thomas.deweese wrote:
>> The comments are still omitted, however but that is a minor issue.
>    The comments (like the DOCTYPE) are omitted because there is no
> place in the DOM to store them.  Since our parser returns a DOM there
> is no way to return them to you.
>    In anycase DOCTYPEs are on the way out, to be replaced with schema
> tied to namespaces.

Fair enough! I won't sweat it then! No need to worry about it.

In  conclusion: no need to worry about this problem. Thanks for your help.

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DOCTYPE-and-COMMENTS-ignored-by-batik-parser-SAXSVGDocumentFactory-tp16001432p16418192.html
Sent from the Batik - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

View raw message