Mailing-List: contact batik-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Batik Users" <batik-users@xml.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of jordi.ferran@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.200 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=CAprR7CmU4IkthOGY0tTguevLD/zLBUz97Dd/UX9BtuGPqyQdIFATf3YyhXCBNWF1xgRXBD6uhJrboIKSpbTzsHA9gvwcmbngEMxR6QK3JChiGrp704dNMZTAGHR1F+Y6smz7b9XIlE6qKaL8SHf82JovnLnlBvjXTuHgwRx0PM=
Message-ID: <814427f9050111093813d7b1c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:38:45 +0100
From: Jordi Ferran <jordi.ferran@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Jordi Ferran <jordi.ferran@gmail.com>
To: Batik Users <batik-users@xml.apache.org>
Subject: [ batik-user ] : Batik Tunning and Performance Issues
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi all,

I'm generating JPEG images with Batik for rendering a great amount of
items, about 35.000 now. The problem is the speed, 8 to 50 seconds is
unacceptable on the real-time scenario I must work with.

Now I use the JPEGTranscoder class combine with a TranscoderInput. I
manually build up the Document tree on memory and then give it to the
TranscoderInput.

My question is:
Which tricky tunning optimizations can I do to speed up the rendering time ?

I see different rendering times (8sec-50sec) depending on the
resolution 400x300 faster than 2000x2000 pixel image, using the same
amount of items to be rendered.

It is any achievement using this library on a real-time scenario with
a heavy load on the rendering component ?

Thanks in advance.

Jordi Ferran Sanchez

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org