Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-batik-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90777 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2005 18:51:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2005 18:51:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 1636 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2005 18:51:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-batik-users-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 1620 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2005 18:51:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact batik-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: "Batik Users" Delivered-To: mailing list batik-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 1605 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2005 18:51:50 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of Thomas.DeWeese@kodak.com designates 192.232.121.200 as permitted sender) Received: from smtp1.kodak.com (HELO smtp1.kodak.com) (192.232.121.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:51:49 -0800 Received: from roc-us-e1000-112.kodak.com (roc-us-e1000-112.kodak.com [192.232.121.192]) by smtp1.kodak.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) with SMTP id j0UIplA19357 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:51:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from (165.170.104.15) by roc-us-e1000-112.kodak.com via smtp id 5629_575f8eae_72f0_11d9_887c_0002b3c946b6; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:54:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41FD2CC0.3010501@Kodak.com> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:51:44 -0500 From: Thomas DeWeese Organization: Eastman Kodak Company User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Batik Users Subject: Re: Differences in PrintTranscoder 1.5 / 1.5.1 ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Bjoern, I don't have time to run the printing tests but I'll comment, that just to make your life more complicated you might want to check out current CVS as I know this sort of thing has been tweaked since the 1.5.1 release - so you might find that things have been 'fixed' since 1.5.1. Bjoern.Stenersen@si-software.de wrote: > i have a problem with the PrintTranscoder. There seems to be a > difference between Batik 1.5 and 1.5.1. Try > to print the SVG postet below with Squiggle 1.5 and use 30mm Margin each > side. The result will be a rectangle > centered in the page. Try the same with Squiggle 1.5.1 and the use the > same options. The rectangle will be clipped. > Is there a way to get the same result with both versions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org