Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94399200BAB for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8A842160ADF; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AA44F160AD7 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:34:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 37787 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2016 13:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Received: (qmail 37773 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2016 13:34:54 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:34:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8873EC0BD0 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:34:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.801 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.801 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_MXURI=1.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kq-GWGDX-_3W for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D7E945FC5F for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u9MDYkbq031010 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:34:47 GMT Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u9MDYkop007294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:34:46 GMT Received: from abhmp0001.oracle.com (abhmp0001.oracle.com [141.146.116.7]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9MDYjck000423; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:34:45 GMT Received: from [10.191.3.86] (/10.191.3.86) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:34:44 -0700 From: "Rory O'Donnell" Subject: Early Access builds for JDK 8u122 b02 , JDK 9 & JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw b140 are available on java.net Cc: rory.odonnell@oracle.com, Dalibor Topic , Balchandra Vaidya , Muneer Kolarkunnu , "batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org" To: Simon Steiner Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 21:34:39 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CA7322AC406F7F11E4D24DFC" X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] archived-at: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:34:57 -0000 --------------CA7322AC406F7F11E4D24DFC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Simon, Early Access b02 for JDK 8u122 is available , summary of changes are listed here. Early Access b140 (#5625) for JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here. Early Access b140 for JDK 9 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here . A couple of items to point out with regard to b140: 1. A fix for Cyclic interface initialization causes JVM crash is included in b140 2. We are requesting feedback on a change that went into JDK 9 b140 The java.io.FilePermission class was changed to remove pathname canonicalization from its creation, along with a system property to revert the behavior back to way it worked in the previous JDK release. We do this mainly for performance enhancement so that there is no need to consult the file system every time a FilePermisson is created. If you use a security manager and file permissions then you should read the details as described on the jdk9 mailing list [1] Feedback is requested via core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net The new GA date of JDK 9 has been updated on the JDK 9 Project page [2], further details in Mark Reinhold's email [3]. Rgds,Rory [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-October/005062.html [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/ [3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-October/005092.html -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA, Dublin,Ireland --------------CA7322AC406F7F11E4D24DFC Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Hi Simon,  

Early Access b02 for JDK 8u122 is available , summary of changes are listed here.

Early Access b140 (#5625) for JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here.

Early Access b140 for JDK 9 is available on java.net, summary of  changes are listed here .

A couple of items to point out with regard to b140:

  1. A fix for Cyclic interface initialization causes JVM crash is included in b140
  2. We are requesting feedback on a change that went into  JDK 9 b140
The java.io.FilePermission class was changed to remove pathname canonicalization from its creation,
along  with a system property to revert the behavior back to way it worked in the previous JDK release.
We do this mainly for performance enhancement so that there is no need to consult the file system every
time a FilePermisson is created. If you use a security manager and file permissions then you should read
the details as described on the jdk9 mailing list [1]

Feedback is requested via core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net

The new GA date of JDK 9 has been updated on the JDK 9 Project page [2], further details in Mark Reinhold's email [3].


Rgds,Rory

[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-October/005062.html
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/
[3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-October/005092.html

--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA, Dublin,Ireland
--------------CA7322AC406F7F11E4D24DFC--