xmlgraphics-batik-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com>
Subject [VOTE] Merge Batik svg12color branch to trunk
Date Mon, 04 Aug 2014 21:44:53 GMT

I would like to merge the Batik svg12color branch to trunk. This work 
was done by Jeremias.

I am interested in using this new functionality with FOP (see attached 
example) and from my testing the code works well, and Jeremias also 
thinks the code is ready.

Note that this branch introduces a dependency in xmlgraphics-commons 
(which in my opinion is a good thing because for the first time commons 
will be common to FOP and Batik!).

I will wait one week before I merge the code so please voice any opinion 
before that if you care. You are also free, and encouraged, to test the 
code and vote!


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: svgcolor12 branch
Date: 	Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:57:10 +0100
From: 	Luis Bernardo <lmpmbernardo@gmail.com>
To: 	batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Hi Jeremias,

I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there 
were no conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge 
by launching a vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself).

Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new 
Batik jar) with an SVG with CMYK.


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch 
<mailto:dev@jeremias-maerki.ch>> wrote:

    Hi Luis

    I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails
    from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.

    Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
    maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and
    the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to
    make the push back into official repositories especially since those API
    changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
    changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also
    merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
    because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to
    URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
    to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
    (official) branch.

    Jeremias Maerki

    On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
     > Hi Jeremias,
     > I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you
    created and
     > worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple
    example) and
     > it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the
     > status of the branch (and implementation)?
     > Thanks,
     > Luis

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message