xmlgraphics-batik-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45779] batik transcoder requires crimson?
Date Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:09:52 GMT
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45779


Helder Magalhães <helder.magalhaes@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |NEW




--- Comment #2 from Helder Magalhães <helder.magalhaes@gmail.com>  2009-04-03 09:09:50
PST ---
First of all, I'd generally suggest placing questions into the mailing lists
[1] first (searching for related threads prior to the post, of course)... One
may prefer using an alternative interface, such as Nabble [2], a bit more user
friendly (specially for searches and such).



(In reply to comment #0)
> Why does the batik transcoder explicitly require the crimson xml parser?  Why
> is it not using the JAXP APIs?

As far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong), this is due to the fact that
Batik targeted Java 1.3 as of Batik release version 1.7. Currently, Java 1.4 is
the target for the trunk version [3].

Apparently, Java 1.3 didn't contain the JAXP features and Java 1.4 had them
with few bugs [4] so I'd say that, until Batik targets Java 1.5, this may be a
requirement...



(In reply to comment #1)
> I am having a problem with Batik in Tomcat on Windows XP and CentOS, but not in
> Jetty, or Tomcat on Mac.
> Any insight?  Is this a bug?

(Read above first.)

I'd say that this is just a coincidence. Probably, in the environments that
work as expected, either:
 * Are using Java 1.4 (which apparently uses the same namespaces for the
embedded JAXP functionality [4] as crimson);
 * Crimson is available in the default classpath.



@Matt Fisher
The "need info" status for bug reports is more targeted at when more
information is required from the reporter [5], which doesn't seem to be the
case here (I understand the underlying idea, though). ;-)



Hope this helps,
 Helder Magalhães



[1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/mailing-lists.html
[2] http://www.nabble.com/Batik-f308.html
[3] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/download.cgi#Subversion+repository
[4]
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/xml/jaxp/JAXP-Compatibility_150.html#packageNamesWhy
[5] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message