Mailing-List: contact batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: batik-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-ID: <412DBB2E.8020606@Kodak.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:27:58 -0400
From: Thomas DeWeese <Thomas.DeWeese@Kodak.com>
Organization: Eastman Kodak Company
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: batik-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: PDF Transcoder: Revisiting transcoder setup
References: <20040816214323.D754.DEV.JEREMIAS@greenmail.ch>
 <41211887.3090600@Kodak.com> <20040823212531.A9F5.DEV.JEREMIAS@greenmail.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20040823212531.A9F5.DEV.JEREMIAS@greenmail.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Jeremias,

    Thanks!

    I have a new small patch for FOP that tells Batik not
to raserize clipped components (I'll submit over on fop-dev).
This is of course one of those tricky 'bootstrapping' issues, since
you can't apply the patch until after you integrate a new Batik... :/

Jeremias Maerki wrote:

> PDFObject.formatDateTime() is now compatible to JDK 1.3 again.
> 
> On 16.08.2004 22:26:47 Thomas DeWeese wrote:
> 
>>>>   1) It looks like a JDK 1.4 dependency has slipped in:
>>>>java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Illegal pattern character 'Z'
>>>
>>>Yes. I will see to that. FOP officially still targets JDK 1.3.x, too,
>>>although some would like that requirement dropped. In that case I will
>>>see to it that the Batik-relevant parts remain 1.3-compatible for the
>>>time being.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org