Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list batik-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 39505 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2000 15:45:20 -0000 Received: from tux.w3.org (root@18.29.0.27) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2000 15:45:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tux.w3.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA11029 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:45:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:47:28 +0200 From: Dean Jackson To: batik-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Question about filter implementation plans Message-ID: <20001027174728.X932@polka> References: <39F8B013.5C53B4D6@eng.sun.com> <14841.28855.658191.434715@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20001027142632.L932@polka> <39F9A0E2.A0DB8E1E@eng.sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <39F9A0E2.A0DB8E1E@eng.sun.com>; from vincent.hardy@eng.sun.com on Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 17:36:02 +0200 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.0.pre2 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:36:02 Vincent Hardy wrote: > > About the other 2 related features (handling of the various in values > and cliping), I think that: > > a. IN Attribute. > > Dean is: 1) writing a common utility to extract a Rable source from > the in attribute value. Yes, and the "result" attribute. > 2) the utility method will take care of the various > predefined sources (such as SourceAlpha, FillPaint, ...) I'll see how far I get with that. > b. Clip > > Thierry is writing the bridge side of things (i.e., setting the clip > on the various GraphicsNode at creation time, which involves handling > the clip property and the clipPath element). GVT already uses the clip > (aliased clip, as per spec. IMHO this is bad, I would rather have > anti-aliased clip, but this is what the SVG spec recommends). I think we need to have an antialiased clip, regardless of what the spec says. It just looks ugly (adobe do antialiased). Dean