Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-xmlbeans-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50712 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2003 03:55:33 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 2003 03:55:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 87365 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2003 03:55:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-xmlbeans-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 87294 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2003 03:55:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xmlbeans-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: xmlbeans-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list xmlbeans-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 87279 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2003 03:55:13 -0000 Message-ID: <001301c38318$1c525f40$6401a8c0@third> From: "Chris Fry" To: References: <4C2F1577F2EF2840A9AE9EC61860C8810A0FED@usseex01.amer.bea.com> Subject: Re: STAX Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 20:50:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hey Cliff, Oh, I was going to check in the RI jar as a library not in src form, this would allow us to get to work on the binding runtime. I would imagine at somepoint we would port the internal parser to implement 173 or build a walker over the splay tree. FYI the jar is publicly available at http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=173 -Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cliff Schmidt" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:43 PM Subject: RE: STAX > Chris, > > As the spec lead for JSR 173/STAX, it would be great to have you > involved, but the process you described isn't really how things work. > If you've got code you'd like to contribute, you can email it to this > list and we can see how it would fit in with the rest of the project > and check it in if it makes sense. If you're talking about an entire > RI, you might want to post the source somewhere for the community to > review. It might also be something more appropriate for another part > of the XML project. We have been talking about making XMLBeans v2 > work with JSR 173, but I don't know if it's appropriate for the entire > RI to be checked in to the tree (aside from the obvious questions of > licensing). > > Cliff > > > On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:13 PM, Chris Fry wrote: > > > Hey Everyone, > > > > Looks like STAX integration is on the plan for v2, do you all think I > > should checkin the latest STAX RI to drive the work? I've got a > > submission ready, ziegler will just have to approve it. > > > > -Chris > > > > > > - > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xmlbeans-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For > > additional commands, e-mail: xmlbeans-dev-help@xml.apache.org Apache > > XMLBeans Project -- URL: http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/ > > - --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xmlbeans-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: xmlbeans-dev-help@xml.apache.org > Apache XMLBeans Project -- URL: http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/ > > - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xmlbeans-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: xmlbeans-dev-help@xml.apache.org Apache XMLBeans Project -- URL: http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/