xml-xmlbeans-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Fry" <christopher....@bea.com>
Subject RE: STAX
Date Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:56:57 GMT
I'll check with the lawyerly folks at BEA, I'm not sure how that works.
Could someone take a look at the license that comes with the distribution
(its royalty free etc.) and see if this license allows us to use the RI jar
as a library?

I've appended the license & the ri jar.

-C

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Bau [mailto:david.bau@bea.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:30 AM
> To: xmlbeans-dev@xml.apache.org; christopher.fry@bea.com
> Subject: Re: STAX
>
>
> If we're going to be writing fast-lossy code, we need have it
> built on a 173
> API since that certainly seems like the right architectural
> direction.  (I'd
> rather not start with SAX at this point; pull will be much
> cleaner than
> push, and if it's pull, we should drive towards the most
> standard interface
> we have in the java world)
>
> Chris, as spec lead, do you have control over the licensing
> of the 173 RI,
> and can we get its source opened for redistribution?  Could
> it be as simple
> a matter (since you+BEA are the original author) of getting
> an Apache CLA
> signed and faxed?
>
> David
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Leung" <twleung@sauria.com>
> To: <xmlbeans-dev@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:26 AM
> Subject: [xmlbeans-dev] Re: STAX
>
>
> > On 9/24/2003 8:50 PM, Chris Fry wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Cliff,
> > >
> > > Oh, I was going to check in the RI jar as a library not
> in src form,
> this
> > > would allow us to get to work on the binding runtime.  I
> would imagine
> at
> > > somepoint we would port the internal parser to implement
> 173 or build a
> > > walker over the splay tree.
> > >
> > > FYI the jar is publicly available at
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=173
> > >
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > I couldn't find the linke to the Jar file on that page.  If
> it has the
> > usual Sun clickthrough binary license, then it probably cannot be
> > checked into the repository, because the typical
> clickthrough license
> > doesn't grant the ASF the ability to redistribute the jar.
> >
> > I think it would be very nice to have XMLBeans implement
> JSR 173, but we
> > need to make sure that all IP issues get taken care of.
> >
> > Ted
> >
> >
> > -
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   xmlbeans-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: xmlbeans-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> > Apache XMLBeans Project -- URL: http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message