Mailing-List: contact xmlbeans-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: xmlbeans-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-ID: <3F33FC6A.9090304@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 21:39:22 +0200
From: Gianugo Rabellino <gianugo@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: xmlbeans-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: packing up and picking up our packages
References: <020301c35de3$c5903eb0$65a8a8c0@lightbox>
In-Reply-To: <020301c35de3$c5903eb0$65a8a8c0@lightbox>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

David Bau wrote:

> Here's a question.  As we're getting code moved reorganized for entry into
> cvs here, we're repackaging things into the org.apache.* structure.  What do
> you think would be appropriate package names?
> 
> For example:
> 
> org.apache.xmlbeans -> all the public APIs, like
> org.apache.xmlbeans.XmlObject
> org.apache.xmlbeans.impl -> all the private implementation classes:
> org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.XmlObjectBase
> xmlbeans.build -> build-tool classes for xmlbeans' build needs (not for
> public consumption)
> xmlbeans.test -> tests for xmlbeans (not for public consumption)

Just a personal opinion, but I like testcases to be in the same package 
of classes being tested, with second best being a "test" subpackage. But 
it's just a matter of taste.

Ciao,

-- 
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. -  http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
     (Now blogging at: http://blogs.cocoondev.org/gianugo/)


- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   xmlbeans-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xmlbeans-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Apache XMLBeans Project -- URL: http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/