Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-xalan-j-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42985 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2008 14:12:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2008 14:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 16958 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2008 14:12:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-xalan-j-users-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 16935 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2008 14:12:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xalan-j-users-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list xalan-j-users@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 16924 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2008 14:12:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:12:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:11:59 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1K6R3g-0003c9-SJ for xalan-j-users@xml.apache.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:12:16 -0700 Message-ID: <17778701.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:12:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Sriram83 To: xalan-j-users@xml.apache.org Subject: Xalan 2.7.1 Vs Xalan 2.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Nabble-From: ssriram83@gmail.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi All,=20 We are planning to migrate from Xalan 2.5.2 to Xalan 2.7.1. During testing, we found few differences in the XSLT output. They were not show stopper issues, but we would like to know whether there are any differences betweee= n 2.5.2 and 2.7.1 ? Has anyone experienced this behaviour with Xalan versions= ? Thanks in Advance, Sriram XSLT Examples:=20 Xalan 2.5.2 Output: 0 Xalan 2.7.1 Output: -0 Xalan 2.5.2 Output: =E2=88=9E Xalan 2.7.1 Output: INFINITY Xalan 2.5.2 Output: 0.55 Xalan 2.7.1 Output: .55 --=20 View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Xalan-2.7.1-Vs-Xalan-2.= 5.2-tp17778701p17778701.html Sent from the Xalan - J - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.