Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact soap-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list soap-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 79202 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2000 19:55:29 -0000 Received: from c017-h014.c017.sfo.cp.net (HELO c017.sfo.cp.net) (209.228.12.228) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2000 19:55:29 -0000 Received: (cpmta 10883 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2000 12:55:02 -0700 Received: from adsl-pool24-84.detroit.mi.ameritech.net (HELO ?10.0.0.3?) (64.108.57.84) by smtp.neochi.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2000 12:55:02 -0700 X-Sent: 8 Aug 2000 19:55:02 GMT Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:55:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "ryan.tecco" X-Sender: rtecco@localhost.localdomain To: soap-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [SOAP] SOAP and Language Bindings? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Is there anyone that has these requirements? I can publish them to the new source forge site. rt > Hi, > > There was some talk about this previously on this list ... and as I > remember James came up with some requirements. I believe that the > discussion that we had already underline the guiding principles for such > an implementation ... If we are about to start again gathering > requirements somebody must take notes and publish these requirements on > the web ... > > - Octav > > PS: Please change the name of the trend. > > ****************************************************************************** > e-mail: ochipara@cse.unl.edu > phone: (402)472-9492 > web page: www.cse.unl.edu/~ochipara > ****************************************************************************** > > On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, ryan.tecco wrote: > > > > > > What about the XML parser....Is Xerces C++ OK? > > > > Looks like it, I was looking at gnome's libxml, and > > the corresponding libxml++, which is a C++ wrapper for > > libxml, but libxml has no mention of supporting schemas, > > whereas Xerces does. > > > > Any idea when schemas are going to be supported? > > > > SourceForge site for the portable, C++ SOAP impl any > > time now... > > > > rt > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: ryan.tecco > > > To: soap-dev@xml.apache.org > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 9:38 AM > > > Subject: Re: [SOAP] SOAP and Language Bindings? > > > > > > > > > > > > I am in the process of implementing some C++ HTTP 1.1 classes > > > that are portable across Linux and Windows (so far.). > > > > > > They do not, though, support the HTTP Extension Framework. > > > I don't know enough to say whether supporting this is > > > worth it or not. > > > > > > rt > > > > > > On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Kailash Aynor wrote: > > > > > > > I would be able to contribute to this development. I have experimented with the Xerces C++ parser. In fact I was also looking forward to first develop a portable HTTP classes. I tried to decode the Apache http implementation(Apache Core) to make use of it. Since it is pure C code, we need to have some wrappers for it(if at all we need to make use of it !!) or other alternative is it look out for already available open-source classes. Has any-body come across any such? > > > > > > > > Kail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Steven McDowall > > > > To: SOAP > > > > Cc: soap-dev@xml.apache.org > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 1:06 PM > > > > Subject: RE: [SOAP] SOAP and Language Bindings? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ryan, > > > > > > > > I have cross posted your message to the Apache SOAP developer list as well > > > > since I know that many of them are "in-progress" of also doing a C++ > > > > binding.. > > > > > > > > Hopefully we can avoid duplication of effort between the two groups.. > > > > > > > > -Steve > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: SOAP [mailto:SOAP@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM]On Behalf Of ryan.tecco > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 7:40 AM > > > > To: SOAP@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM > > > > Subject: [SOAP] SOAP and Language Bindings? > > > > > > > > > > > > I am about ready to start an open source, portable C++ > > > > implementation of SOAP 1.1 for my company. I have a SourceForge > > > > site pending, which I will post to the list ASAP. I would invite > > > > any developer interested in joining up at the page and getting > > > > on the mailing list. The timeframe would be a compliant 1.1 > > > > system by late November. > > > > > > > > Specifically, I am wondering about the issue of language binding, > > > > coming from the CORBA world. > > > > > > > > rt > > > > > > > > You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or > > > > subscribe to other > > > > DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ---------------- > > > ryan.tecco > > > > > > "Everything is controlled by a small > > > evil group to which, unfortunately, > > > no one we know belongs." > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ---------------- > > ryan.tecco > > > > "Everything is controlled by a small > > evil group to which, unfortunately, > > no one we know belongs." > > > > -- ---------------- ryan.tecco "Everything is controlled by a small evil group to which, unfortunately, no one we know belongs."